Fantastically well written and well argued article. The thing that to me terminates this entire endeavor, even before what it turned into on Twitter, is the nullifying paradox of “we need to breed higher specimens” and “won’t someone think of the poor cowardly losers who can’t get laid?!” The sexual market place IS eugenic, you can’t lament how it leaves some men out in the cold and then advocate for a breeding program. It shows unseriousness, which became clear eventually anyway, and it really makes me wonder why he bothered to address the incels at all in his dissertation. It truly makes no sense to me
Thank you for the compliment and your observation about Costin's double think here is interesting and a good critique imo. I mean, i'm assuming he's being a bit Straussian here and just putting on a show of sympathy and false solidarity for his fans. Most of whom he likely despises. He's stated in the past (I believe in an old Phora post) that he believes only the top 2-3 percent of men should be allowed to breed and the rest should be encouraged to indulge in homosexuality, which is likely closer to his true position imo.
He didn’t have an audience when he wrote that tho, beyond whoever he present this to. Ultimately this project is Straussian, and also neoconnish, which is also Straussian, but this selective breeding thing and the apparent Zionism he espouses is even MORE Straussian than the neocons. All of these arguments have already been presented before tho not as sophisticated or intelligent. But they’ve been saying all this since the 60s
actually (assuming we are talking about the same passages here) all of the passages I quote in this piece in which he talks about sexual marketplace dynamics and the plight of sexless young men etc come from the new foreword, which was not part of the original dissertation. Which was released after his rise to prominence.
The idea of an undercurrent of eugenicism and even Nordicism among intellectual elite Zionists is one hell of a can of worms (Epstein and Maxwell fit the bill pretty well). Maybe to them National Socialism isnt the enemy because of the eugenics and racialism per se but because of the direction it was pointed (besides the obvious exclusion of jews making it incompatible with Zionism, the Nazis weren't really that Nordicist and it could be argued the policies were aimed to breed large numbers of a more peasant caste white people, from a BAPiam perspective)
BAP would have less of an audience if COVID had not conclusively proved that we do indeed live among a great mass of easily frightened untermensch that were willing to sacrifice the youth and anything that makes life worth living in a fit of deeply feminine hysteria.
While reading it, I paused to find my heavily marked up and annotated copy of the 2023 edition of “Selective Breeding and the Birth of Philosophy”.
Deep in Chapter 3 I found this section on how to establish the national machinery of eugenics: “Overt tyranny in the name of nature and breeding—like Socrates’ student Critias attempted—is not possible and causes an even greater conventional or democratic reaction . . . . He doesn’t have the necessary remove from convention to really understand how to seduce and subdue it in the long term . . . I would claim that not only do Socrates and Callicles agree fundamentally on the ‘problem’ . . . but even on the solution, which is to ‘rule in the city.’ It is only that Plato is much wilier about how to achieve this and that, in fully understanding the requirements of rule and therefore of legislation in the highest degree, he realises Callicles’ aristocratic radicalism must be spiritualised; and similarly the form of (rhetorical) warfare for which Callicles is eager must be spiritualised or intellectualised.”
My handwritten comment on this passage is “Is CIA on the way to achieving this on behalf of the Billionaire Class?”
We seem to have come to a similar landing on BAP and what he indicates about our future.
Exactly. We're CURRENTLY living through a massive demographic change that has destabilized and worsened America. What's gonna happen when it's fifty million starving Africans showing up? Do I view them as fellow Christians while ignoring that my children's home is being made permanently worse?
No. The moral law never asks you to sacrifice your proximate duties for remote ones. But it does command you to trade some wealth, attention, and ingenuity so that distant innocents do not perish needlessly. That is not altruistic suicide; it is civilisational prudence. Unchecked famine breeds pandemics, terror networks, and great-power interventions that will reach your doorstep anyway.
I still find it befuddling that Costin can write a whole book about selective breeding in humans (which in my opinion includes aristocratic arranged marriages), but yet rumor has it that he is gay. What is he thinking? Is he actually gay, or is it just a wild rumor?
The modern “selective breeding” will just be a bunch of tech bros creating gene-edited test tube babies. So I guess it doesn’t really matter if he’s gay.
Many Christians have lost what The Bible really says and who is who among the descendants of Abraham. We should have no problem with maintaining our ethnic borders even to mass starvation in other lands and vehemently opposing Zionism and the seed that spawned it, as well as the gay and space stuff.
You tend towards rather loaded and weighted words for a neutral observer. I believe the term is known as 'slant.' often used in journalism. As far as reality, the situation is fairly dire with nearly the entirety of Europe overrun by Muslims and various browns and blacks. All of the usual crimes are way up, provided by those selfsame people.
The solution of course, is being enacted currently. Not slaughter, but simply by removing the unwanted elements and sending them back home. The Muslims for instance, provide a difficult conundrum. a 1400 year old extremely vile 'religious' system by now nearly bred in. Inbreeding and genetic defects common, as it is in Indians. It's possible what you call Gay Space fascism is simply the need to maintain a healthy population (which, by the way, RFK is assisting in.).
What is your goal here? You appear to attempt to paint the current powers in the US in a certain way, primarily through your use of those self same loaded words. A primary focus seems to be words that imply emotional content, not what you call reality or facts. Do you have an overall goal or just a series of complaints? Not to say the article isn't quite well written, it is.
Do you propose a solution or shall you simply continue to point out Gay Space fascism?
If classical Greece had such a good eugenics system, and eugenics is the central thing, why did it fail? It was pretty clear in its twilight before Christianity came along.
This is all rather disturbing, and (though the possibility turns my stomach) it suggests that the early targeting of USAID & PEPFAR may have been motivated in part by a desire to simply see fewer Africans alive. I'm curious to know how Thiel has used his resources to support Costin's work.
Fantastically well written and well argued article. The thing that to me terminates this entire endeavor, even before what it turned into on Twitter, is the nullifying paradox of “we need to breed higher specimens” and “won’t someone think of the poor cowardly losers who can’t get laid?!” The sexual market place IS eugenic, you can’t lament how it leaves some men out in the cold and then advocate for a breeding program. It shows unseriousness, which became clear eventually anyway, and it really makes me wonder why he bothered to address the incels at all in his dissertation. It truly makes no sense to me
Thank you for the compliment and your observation about Costin's double think here is interesting and a good critique imo. I mean, i'm assuming he's being a bit Straussian here and just putting on a show of sympathy and false solidarity for his fans. Most of whom he likely despises. He's stated in the past (I believe in an old Phora post) that he believes only the top 2-3 percent of men should be allowed to breed and the rest should be encouraged to indulge in homosexuality, which is likely closer to his true position imo.
He didn’t have an audience when he wrote that tho, beyond whoever he present this to. Ultimately this project is Straussian, and also neoconnish, which is also Straussian, but this selective breeding thing and the apparent Zionism he espouses is even MORE Straussian than the neocons. All of these arguments have already been presented before tho not as sophisticated or intelligent. But they’ve been saying all this since the 60s
actually (assuming we are talking about the same passages here) all of the passages I quote in this piece in which he talks about sexual marketplace dynamics and the plight of sexless young men etc come from the new foreword, which was not part of the original dissertation. Which was released after his rise to prominence.
Everything in the section “the crisis of sexual inequality” that wasn’t in the original?
yes, I just doubled checked. It's all from the new introduction (which is very much worth reading in full fwiw).
Ha! So he is catering to his audience. Even LESS reason to take any of this seriously haha
The idea of an undercurrent of eugenicism and even Nordicism among intellectual elite Zionists is one hell of a can of worms (Epstein and Maxwell fit the bill pretty well). Maybe to them National Socialism isnt the enemy because of the eugenics and racialism per se but because of the direction it was pointed (besides the obvious exclusion of jews making it incompatible with Zionism, the Nazis weren't really that Nordicist and it could be argued the policies were aimed to breed large numbers of a more peasant caste white people, from a BAPiam perspective)
BAP would have less of an audience if COVID had not conclusively proved that we do indeed live among a great mass of easily frightened untermensch that were willing to sacrifice the youth and anything that makes life worth living in a fit of deeply feminine hysteria.
Scintillating article—very well done, indeed!
While reading it, I paused to find my heavily marked up and annotated copy of the 2023 edition of “Selective Breeding and the Birth of Philosophy”.
Deep in Chapter 3 I found this section on how to establish the national machinery of eugenics: “Overt tyranny in the name of nature and breeding—like Socrates’ student Critias attempted—is not possible and causes an even greater conventional or democratic reaction . . . . He doesn’t have the necessary remove from convention to really understand how to seduce and subdue it in the long term . . . I would claim that not only do Socrates and Callicles agree fundamentally on the ‘problem’ . . . but even on the solution, which is to ‘rule in the city.’ It is only that Plato is much wilier about how to achieve this and that, in fully understanding the requirements of rule and therefore of legislation in the highest degree, he realises Callicles’ aristocratic radicalism must be spiritualised; and similarly the form of (rhetorical) warfare for which Callicles is eager must be spiritualised or intellectualised.”
My handwritten comment on this passage is “Is CIA on the way to achieving this on behalf of the Billionaire Class?”
We seem to have come to a similar landing on BAP and what he indicates about our future.
So what do *you* think the West should do when Africa starves? It's easy to criticize but your own answer is unclear.
Exactly. We're CURRENTLY living through a massive demographic change that has destabilized and worsened America. What's gonna happen when it's fifty million starving Africans showing up? Do I view them as fellow Christians while ignoring that my children's home is being made permanently worse?
No. The moral law never asks you to sacrifice your proximate duties for remote ones. But it does command you to trade some wealth, attention, and ingenuity so that distant innocents do not perish needlessly. That is not altruistic suicide; it is civilisational prudence. Unchecked famine breeds pandemics, terror networks, and great-power interventions that will reach your doorstep anyway.
I still find it befuddling that Costin can write a whole book about selective breeding in humans (which in my opinion includes aristocratic arranged marriages), but yet rumor has it that he is gay. What is he thinking? Is he actually gay, or is it just a wild rumor?
The modern “selective breeding” will just be a bunch of tech bros creating gene-edited test tube babies. So I guess it doesn’t really matter if he’s gay.
Hes bisexual so in theory that wouldnt stop him from breeding
I have sources in Brazil who've confirmed Costin's taste for the bussy. BAP is a buttfaggot and he takes money from the Buttfaggot Peter Thiel.
Many Christians have lost what The Bible really says and who is who among the descendants of Abraham. We should have no problem with maintaining our ethnic borders even to mass starvation in other lands and vehemently opposing Zionism and the seed that spawned it, as well as the gay and space stuff.
Costin Alamariu is a Buttfaggot Nonce.
Amazing analysis.
You tend towards rather loaded and weighted words for a neutral observer. I believe the term is known as 'slant.' often used in journalism. As far as reality, the situation is fairly dire with nearly the entirety of Europe overrun by Muslims and various browns and blacks. All of the usual crimes are way up, provided by those selfsame people.
The solution of course, is being enacted currently. Not slaughter, but simply by removing the unwanted elements and sending them back home. The Muslims for instance, provide a difficult conundrum. a 1400 year old extremely vile 'religious' system by now nearly bred in. Inbreeding and genetic defects common, as it is in Indians. It's possible what you call Gay Space fascism is simply the need to maintain a healthy population (which, by the way, RFK is assisting in.).
What is your goal here? You appear to attempt to paint the current powers in the US in a certain way, primarily through your use of those self same loaded words. A primary focus seems to be words that imply emotional content, not what you call reality or facts. Do you have an overall goal or just a series of complaints? Not to say the article isn't quite well written, it is.
Do you propose a solution or shall you simply continue to point out Gay Space fascism?
If classical Greece had such a good eugenics system, and eugenics is the central thing, why did it fail? It was pretty clear in its twilight before Christianity came along.
This is all rather disturbing, and (though the possibility turns my stomach) it suggests that the early targeting of USAID & PEPFAR may have been motivated in part by a desire to simply see fewer Africans alive. I'm curious to know how Thiel has used his resources to support Costin's work.